quickws高性能 Websocket 库

联合创作 · 2023-09-29 12:05

quickws是一个高性能的 websocket 库。

特性

  • 3倍的简单
  • 实现rfc6455
  • 实现rfc7692

内容

注意⚠️

quickws默认返回read buffer的浅引用,如果生命周期超过OnMessage的,需要clone一份再使用

Installation

go get github.com/antlabs/quickws

example

服务端


package main

import (
    "fmt"
    "net/http"
    "time"
    "github.com/antlabs/quickws"
)

type echoHandler struct{}

func (e *echoHandler) OnOpen(c *quickws.Conn) {
    fmt.Println("OnOpen:", c)
}

func (e *echoHandler) OnMessage(c *quickws.Conn, op quickws.Opcode, msg []byte) {
    fmt.Println("OnMessage:", c, msg, op)
    if err := c.WriteTimeout(op, msg, 3*time.Second); err != nil {
        fmt.Println("write fail:", err)
    }
}

func (e *echoHandler) OnClose(c *quickws.Conn, err error) {
    fmt.Println("OnClose:", c, err)
}

// echo测试服务
func echo(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
    c, err := quickws.Upgrade(w, r, quickws.WithServerReplyPing(),
        // quickws.WithServerDecompression(),
        // quickws.WithServerIgnorePong(),
        quickws.WithServerCallback(&echoHandler{}),
        quickws.WithServerReadTimeout(5*time.Second),
    )
    if err != nil {
        fmt.Println("Upgrade fail:", err)
        return
    }

    c.StartReadLoop()
}

func main() {
    http.HandleFunc("/", echo)

    http.ListenAndServe(":9001", nil)
}

客户端

package main

import (
    "fmt"

    "github.com/antlabs/quickws"
)

type echoHandler struct{}

func (e *echoHandler) OnOpen(c *quickws.Conn) {
    fmt.Println("OnOpen:", c)
}

func (e *echoHandler) OnMessage(c *quickws.Conn, op quickws.Opcode, msg []byte) {
    fmt.Println("OnMessage:", c, msg, op)
    if err := c.WriteTimeout(op, msg, 3*time.Second); err != nil {
        fmt.Println("write fail:", err)
    }
}

func (e *echoHandler) OnClose(c *quickws.Conn, err error) {
    fmt.Println("OnClose:", c, err)
}

func main() {
    c, err := quickws.Dial("ws://127.0.0.1:12345/test")
    if err != nil {
        fmt.Printf("err = %v\\n", err)
        return
    }

    c.WriteMessage(quickws.Text, []byte("hello")])
    c.ReadLoop()

}

配置函数

客户端配置参数

配置header

func main() {
    quickws.Dial("ws://127.0.0.1:12345/test", quickws.WithClientHTTPHeader(http.Header{
        "h1": "v1",
        "h2":"v2",
    }))
}

配置握手时的超时时间

func main() {
    quickws.Dial("ws://127.0.0.1:12345/test", quickws.WithClientDialTimeout(2 * time.Second))
}

配置自动回复ping消息

func main() {
    quickws.Dial("ws://127.0.0.1:12345/test", quickws.WithClientReplyPing())
}

服务端配置参数

配置服务自动回复ping消息

func main() {
    c, err := quickws.Upgrade(w, r, quickws.WithServerReplyPing())
        if err != nil {
                fmt.Println("Upgrade fail:", err)
                return
        }
}

常见问题

1.为什么quickws不标榜zero upgrade?

第一:quickws 是基于 std 的方案实现的 websocket 协议。

第二:原因是 zero upgrade 对 websocket 的性能提升几乎没有影响(同步方式),所以 quickws 就没有选择花时间优化 upgrade 过程,

直接基于 net/http, websocket 的协议是整体符合大数定律,一个存活几秒的websocket协议由 upgrade(握手) frame(数据包) frame frame 。。。组成。

所以随着时间的增长, upgrade 对整体的影响接近于0,我们用数字代入下。

A: 代表 upgrade 可能会慢点,但是 frame 的过程比较快,比如基于 net/http 方案的 websocket

upgrade (100ms) frame(10ms) frame(10ms) frame(10ms) avg = 32.5ms

B: 代表主打zero upgrade的库,假如frame的过程处理慢点,

upgrade (90ms) frame(15ms) frame(15ms) frame(15ms) avg = 33.75ms

简单代入下已经证明了,决定 websocket 差距的是 frame 的处理过程,无论是tps还是内存占用 quickws 在实战中也会证明这个点。所以没有必须也不需要在 upgrade 下功夫,常规优化就够了。

2.quickws tps如何

在5800h的cpu上面,tps稳定在47w/s,接近48w/s。比gorilla使用ReadMessage的38.9w/s,快了近9w/s

quickws.1:
1s:357999/s 2s:418860/s 3s:440650/s 4s:453360/s 5s:461108/s 6s:465898/s 7s:469211/s 8s:470780/s 9s:472923/s 10s:473821/s 11s:474525/s 12s:475463/s 13s:476021/s 14s:476410/s 15s:477593/s 16s:477943/s 17s:478038/s
gorilla-linux-ReadMessage.4.1
1s:271126/s 2s:329367/s 3s:353468/s 4s:364842/s 5s:371908/s 6s:377633/s 7s:380870/s 8s:383271/s 9s:384646/s 10s:385986/s 11s:386448/s 12s:386554/s 13s:387573/s 14s:388263/s 15s:388701/s 16s:388867/s 17s:389383/s
gorilla-linux-UseReader.4.2:
1s:293888/s 2s:377628/s 3s:399744/s 4s:413150/s 5s:421092/s 6s:426666/s 7s:430239/s 8s:432801/s 9s:434977/s 10s:436058/s 11s:436805/s 12s:437865/s 13s:438421/s 14s:438901/s 15s:439133/s 16s:439409/s 17s:439578/s
gobwas.6:
1s:215995/s 2s:279405/s 3s:302249/s 4s:312545/s 5s:318922/s 6s:323800/s 7s:326908/s 8s:329977/s 9s:330959/s 10s:331510/s 11s:331911/s 12s:332396/s 13s:332418/s 14s:332887/s 15s:333198/s 16s:333390/s 17s:333550/s

3.quickws 流量测试数据如何 ?

在5800h的cpu上面, 同尺寸read buffer(4k), 对比默认用法,quickws在30s处理119GB数据,gorilla处理48GB数据。

  • quickws
quickws.windows.tcp.delay.4x:
Destination: [127.0.0.1]:9000
Interface lo address [127.0.0.1]:0
Using interface lo to connect to [127.0.0.1]:9000
Ramped up to 10000 connections.
Total data sent:     119153.9 MiB (124941915494 bytes)
Total data received: 119594.6 MiB (125404036361 bytes)
Bandwidth per channel: 6.625⇅ Mbps (828.2 kBps)
Aggregate bandwidth: 33439.980↓, 33316.752↑ Mbps
Packet rate estimate: 3174704.8↓, 2930514.7↑ (9↓, 34↑ TCP MSS/op)
Test duration: 30.001 s.
  • gorilla 使用ReadMessage取数据
gorilla-linux-ReadMessage.tcp.delay:
WARNING: Dumb terminal, expect unglorified output.
Destination: [127.0.0.1]:9003
Interface lo address [127.0.0.1]:0
Using interface lo to connect to [127.0.0.1]:9003
Ramped up to 10000 connections.
Total data sent:     48678.1 MiB (51042707521 bytes)
Total data received: 50406.2 MiB (52854715802 bytes)
Bandwidth per channel: 2.771⇅ Mbps (346.3 kBps)
Aggregate bandwidth: 14094.587↓, 13611.385↑ Mbps
Packet rate estimate: 1399915.6↓, 1190593.2↑ (6↓, 45↑ TCP MSS/op)
Test duration: 30 s.

4.内存占用如何 ?

quickws的特色之一是低内存占用。

1w连接的tps测试,1k payload 回写,初始内存占用约122MB, 在240s-260s之后大约86MB,

浏览 23
点赞
评论
收藏
分享

手机扫一扫分享

编辑 分享
举报
评论
图片
表情
推荐
点赞
评论
收藏
分享

手机扫一扫分享

编辑 分享
举报