BenchmarkDotNet性能测试
DotNetCore实战
共 11693字，需浏览 24分钟
· 2021-06-16
BenchmarkDotNet是一款开源的性能测试工具，使用方式非常简单，特别是对实现同一功能的两种方式，犹豫不决时，可以使用它进行个对比。
比如我们比较ADO.NET方式查询数据库表，和用Dapper方式获取数据为表，只需要在两个方法上增加 [Benchmark]就可以了，然后调用var summary = BenchmarkRunner.Run<Cycle>();就实现了性能测试。
using System;using System.ComponentModel;using System.Data;using System.Data.SqlClient;using System.Security.Cryptography;using BenchmarkDotNet.Attributes;using BenchmarkDotNet.Running;using Dapper;namespace MyBenchmarks{public class Product{public string Name { get; set; }public string ProductNumber { get; set; }public bool MakeFlag { get; set; }public bool FinishedGoodsFlag { get; set; }public string Color { get; set; }public short SafetyStockLevel { get; set; }public short ReorderPoint { get; set; }public decimal StandardCost { get; set; }public decimal ListPrice { get; set; }public string Size { get; set; }public string SizeUnitMeasureCode { get; set; }public string WeightUnitMeasureCode { get; set; }public double Weight { get; set; }public int DaysToManufacture { get; set; }public string ProductLine { get; set; }public string Class { get; set; }public string Style { get; set; }public int ProductSubcategoryID { get; set; }public int ProductModelID { get; set; }public DateTime SellStartDate { get; set; }public DateTime SellEndDate { get; set; }public DateTime DiscontinuedDate { get; set; }public Guid rowguid { get; set; }public DateTime ModifiedDate { get; set; }}public class Cycle{[Benchmark]public void DapperTest(){var conn = new SqlConnection("Data Source=.;Initial Catalog=AdventureWorks2016;Persist Security Info=True;User ID=sa;password=sa;");var table = conn.Query<Product>("select top 100 * from production.product");}[Benchmark]public void CommandTest(){var conn = "Data Source=.;Initial Catalog=AdventureWorks2016;Persist Security Info=True;User ID=sa;password=sa;";var sql = "select top 100 * from production.product";var dapp = new SqlDataAdapter(sql, conn);var table = new DataTable();dapp.Fill(table);}}public class Program{public static void Main(string[] args){var summary = BenchmarkRunner.Run<Cycle>();}}}
运行一下看一下结果，为了减少篇幅，删除了一些结果，从结果看出，为了得到较为客观的性能测试结果，BenchmarkDotNet还是做了很多工作的：
OverheadJitting，WorkloadJitting，WorkloadPilot，OverheadWarmup，OverheadActual，WorkloadWarmup，WorkloadActual，WorkloadResult。
并且通过最后的一个表格，清楚的给出了结果。同时还给出了Warnings ，以供参考。
Validating benchmarks:***** BenchmarkRunner: Start ********** Found 2 benchmark(s) in total ********** Building 1 exe(s) in Parallel: Start *****start dotnet restore /p:UseSharedCompilation=false /p:BuildInParallel=false /m:1 /p:Deterministic=true /p:Optimize=true in C:\MyFile\Source\Repos\Asp.NetCoreExperiment\Asp.NetCoreExperiment\BenchmarkDotNet\Demo01\bin\Release\net6.0\03bf0209-ac26-4de1-b763-4ba03e46cf4dcommand took 2.83s and exited with 0start dotnet build -c Release --no-restore /p:UseSharedCompilation=false /p:BuildInParallel=false /m:1 /p:Deterministic=true /p:Optimize=true in C:\MyFile\Source\Repos\Asp.NetCoreExperiment\Asp.NetCoreExperiment\BenchmarkDotNet\Demo01\bin\Release\net6.0\03bf0209-ac26-4de1-b763-4ba03e46cf4dcommand took 4.29s and exited with 0***** Done, took 00:00:07 (7.52 sec) *****Found 2 benchmarks:Cycle.DapperTest: DefaultJobCycle.CommandTest: DefaultJob**************************Benchmark: Cycle.DapperTest: DefaultJob*** Execute ***Launch: 1 / 1Execute: dotnet "03bf0209-ac26-4de1-b763-4ba03e46cf4d.dll" --benchmarkName "MyBenchmarks.Cycle.DapperTest" --job "Default" --benchmarkId 0 in C:\MyFile\Source\Repos\Asp.NetCoreExperiment\Asp.NetCoreExperiment\BenchmarkDotNet\Demo01\bin\Release\net6.0\03bf0209-ac26-4de1-b763-4ba03e46cf4d\bin\Release\net6.0BeforeAnythingElseBenchmark Process Environment Information:Runtime=.NET 6.0.0 (6.0.21.25307), X64 RyuJITGC=Concurrent WorkstationJob: DefaultJobOverheadJitting 1: 1 op, 229700.00 ns, 229.7000 us/opWorkloadJitting 1: 1 op, 410021000.00 ns, 410.0210 ms/opWorkloadWarmup 1: 1 op, 4581600.00 ns, 4.5816 ms/opWorkloadWarmup 2: 1 op, 746500.00 ns, 746.5000 us/opWorkloadWarmup 3: 1 op, 830000.00 ns, 830.0000 us/opWorkloadWarmup 4: 1 op, 822900.00 ns, 822.9000 us/opWorkloadWarmup 5: 1 op, 741800.00 ns, 741.8000 us/opWorkloadWarmup 6: 1 op, 746900.00 ns, 746.9000 us/opWorkloadWarmup 7: 1 op, 826300.00 ns, 826.3000 us/opWorkloadWarmup 8: 1 op, 698300.00 ns, 698.3000 us/opBeforeActualRunWorkloadActual 1: 1 op, 755100.00 ns, 755.1000 us/op……WorkloadActual 100: 1 op, 712700.00 ns, 712.7000 us/opAfterActualRunWorkloadResult 1: 1 op, 755100.00 ns, 755.1000 us/op……WorkloadResult 95: 1 op, 712700.00 ns, 712.7000 us/opAfterAllBenchmark Process 26724 has exited with code 0Mean = 753.054 us, StdErr = 11.687 us (1.55%), N = 95, StdDev = 113.909 usMin = 578.400 us, Q1 = 668.600 us, Median = 734.900 us, Q3 = 798.800 us, Max = 1,052.600 usIQR = 130.200 us, LowerFence = 473.300 us, UpperFence = 994.100 usConfidenceInterval = [713.353 us; 792.754 us] (CI 99.9%), Margin = 39.701 us (5.27% of Mean)Skewness = 0.87, Kurtosis = 2.93, MValue = 3.63**************************Benchmark: Cycle.CommandTest: DefaultJob*** Execute ***Launch: 1 / 1Execute: dotnet "03bf0209-ac26-4de1-b763-4ba03e46cf4d.dll" --benchmarkName "MyBenchmarks.Cycle.CommandTest" --job "Default" --benchmarkId 1 in C:\MyFile\Source\Repos\Asp.NetCoreExperiment\Asp.NetCoreExperiment\BenchmarkDotNet\Demo01\bin\Release\net6.0\03bf0209-ac26-4de1-b763-4ba03e46cf4d\bin\Release\net6.0BeforeAnythingElseBenchmark Process Environment Information:Runtime=.NET 6.0.0 (6.0.21.25307), X64 RyuJITGC=Concurrent WorkstationJob: DefaultJobOverheadJitting 1: 1 op, 215400.00 ns, 215.4000 us/opWorkloadJitting 1: 1 op, 339247500.00 ns, 339.2475 ms/opWorkloadWarmup 1: 1 op, 3680100.00 ns, 3.6801 ms/opWorkloadWarmup 2: 1 op, 943000.00 ns, 943.0000 us/opWorkloadWarmup 3: 1 op, 875200.00 ns, 875.2000 us/opWorkloadWarmup 4: 1 op, 982500.00 ns, 982.5000 us/opWorkloadWarmup 5: 1 op, 956900.00 ns, 956.9000 us/opWorkloadWarmup 6: 1 op, 1030800.00 ns, 1.0308 ms/opWorkloadWarmup 7: 1 op, 1170900.00 ns, 1.1709 ms/opWorkloadWarmup 8: 1 op, 1169400.00 ns, 1.1694 ms/opBeforeActualRunWorkloadActual 1: 1 op, 975400.00 ns, 975.4000 us/op……WorkloadActual 100: 1 op, 897400.00 ns, 897.4000 us/opAfterActualRunWorkloadResult 1: 1 op, 975400.00 ns, 975.4000 us/op……WorkloadResult 91: 1 op, 897400.00 ns, 897.4000 us/opAfterAllBenchmark Process 17300 has exited with code 0Mean = 951.263 us, StdErr = 13.676 us (1.44%), N = 91, StdDev = 130.465 usMin = 759.300 us, Q1 = 864.000 us, Median = 912.900 us, Q3 = 1,004.600 us, Max = 1,316.000 usIQR = 140.600 us, LowerFence = 653.100 us, UpperFence = 1,215.500 usConfidenceInterval = [904.736 us; 997.789 us] (CI 99.9%), Margin = 46.526 us (4.89% of Mean)Skewness = 0.95, Kurtosis = 3.05, MValue = 2.44***** BenchmarkRunner: Finish ****** Export *BenchmarkDotNet.Artifacts\results\MyBenchmarks.Cycle-report.csvBenchmarkDotNet.Artifacts\results\MyBenchmarks.Cycle-report-github.mdBenchmarkDotNet.Artifacts\results\MyBenchmarks.Cycle-report.html* Detailed results *: DefaultJobRuntime = .NET 6.0.0 (6.0.21.25307), X64 RyuJIT; GC = Concurrent WorkstationMean = 753.054 us, StdErr = 11.687 us (1.55%), N = 95, StdDev = 113.909 usMin = 578.400 us, Q1 = 668.600 us, Median = 734.900 us, Q3 = 798.800 us, Max = 1,052.600 usIQR = 130.200 us, LowerFence = 473.300 us, UpperFence = 994.100 usConfidenceInterval = [713.353 us; 792.754 us] (CI 99.9%), Margin = 39.701 us (5.27% of Mean)Skewness = 0.87, Kurtosis = 2.93, MValue = 3.63Histogram --------------------545.635 us ; 582.035 us) | @582.035 us ; 650.935 us) | @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@650.935 us ; 726.135 us) | @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@726.135 us ; 791.665 us) | @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@791.665 us ; 852.365 us) | @@@@@@@@852.365 us ; 924.365 us) | @@@924.365 us ; 1,009.685 us) | @@@@@@@@@@@us ; 1,085.365 us) | @@---------------------------------------------------: DefaultJobRuntime = .NET 6.0.0 (6.0.21.25307), X64 RyuJIT; GC = Concurrent WorkstationMean = 951.263 us, StdErr = 13.676 us (1.44%), N = 91, StdDev = 130.465 usMin = 759.300 us, Q1 = 864.000 us, Median = 912.900 us, Q3 = 1,004.600 us, Max = 1,316.000 usIQR = 140.600 us, LowerFence = 653.100 us, UpperFence = 1,215.500 usConfidenceInterval = [904.736 us; 997.789 us] (CI 99.9%), Margin = 46.526 us (4.89% of Mean)Skewness = 0.95, Kurtosis = 3.05, MValue = 2.44Histogram --------------------721.230 us ; 780.280 us) | @@780.280 us ; 860.730 us) | @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@860.730 us ; 936.870 us) | @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@936.870 us ; 1,020.120 us) | @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@us ; 1,080.630 us) | @@@@@us ; 1,170.980 us) | @@@@@@@us ; 1,247.120 us) | @@@@@@@@us ; 1,277.930 us) |us ; 1,354.070 us) | @---------------------------------------------------* Summary *BenchmarkDotNet=v0.13.0, OS=Windows 10.0.19043.1052 (21H1/May2021Update)Intel Core i7-7700HQ CPU 2.80GHz (Kaby Lake), 1 CPU, 8 logical and 4 physical coresSDK=6.0.100-preview.4.21255.9: .NET 6.0.0 (6.0.21.25307), X64 RyuJIT [AttachedDebugger]DefaultJob : .NET 6.0.0 (6.0.21.25307), X64 RyuJITMethod | Mean | Error | StdDev | Median ||---------:|---------:|---------:|---------:|DapperTest | 753.1 us | 39.70 us | 113.9 us | 734.9 us |CommandTest | 951.3 us | 46.53 us | 130.5 us | 912.9 us |* Warnings *MultimodalDistribution: Default -> It seems that the distribution is bimodal (mValue = 3.63)EnvironmentSummary -> Benchmark was executed with attached debuggerMinIterationTime: Default -> The minimum observed iteration time is 578.4000 us which is very small. It's recommended to increase it to at least 100.0000 ms using more operations.: Default -> The minimum observed iteration time is 759.3000 us which is very small. It's recommended to increase it to at least 100.0000 ms using more operations.* Hints *Outliers: Default -> 5 outliers were removed (1.06 ms..2.17 ms): Default -> 9 outliers were removed (1.37 ms..2.51 ms)* Legends *Mean : Arithmetic mean of all measurementsError : Half of 99.9% confidence intervalStdDev : Standard deviation of all measurementsMedian : Value separating the higher half of all measurements (50th percentile)1 us : 1 Microsecond (0.000001 sec)***** BenchmarkRunner: End ******* Remained 0 benchmark(s) to run **Run time: 00:00:03 (3.12 sec), executed benchmarks: 2Global total time: 00:00:10 (10.65 sec), executed benchmarks: 2// * Artifacts cleanup *
.NET Core实战项目之CMS 第一章 入门篇-开篇及总体规划
【.NET Core微服务实战-统一身份认证】开篇及目录索引
Redis基本使用及百亿数据量中的使用技巧分享（附视频地址及观看指南）
.NET Core中的一个接口多种实现的依赖注入与动态选择看这篇就够了
用abp vNext快速开发Quartz.NET定时任务管理界面
评论
测试新人，如何快速上手一个陌生的系统！
大家好，我是狂师！作为刚入行不久的测试新人，面对一个陌生的系统时，可能会感到有些手足无措。面对一个全新的系统系统，如何快速上手并展开有效的测试工作是一个重要的挑战。本文将探讨测试新人如何通过一系列步骤和策略，快速熟悉并掌握新系统的测试要点，从而提高测试效率和质量。本文旨在为测试新手提供一份指导，帮助
测试开发技术
0
APP 安全测试项总结
一、安装包测试 1.1、关于反编译 目的是为了保护公司的知识产权和安全方面的考虑等，一些程序开发人员会在源码中硬编码一些敏感信息，如密码。而且若程序内部一些设计欠佳的逻辑，也可能隐含漏洞，一旦源码泄漏，安全隐患巨大。 为了避免这些问题，除了代码审核外，通常开发的做法是对代码进行混淆，混淆后源代
测试开发技术
0
自动化测试做得好的标准是什么
自动化测试要做得好的标准，主要包括以下几个方面：一、高覆盖率与精准定位1、测试用例覆盖全面：自动化测试应覆盖产品的核心功能、关键业务流程以及常见的异常场景，确保测试范围广泛，降低遗漏风险。2、问题定位准确：自动化测试应能够精准地识别并定位问题，包括缺陷的位置、产生的原因以及可能的影响，为开发团队提供
测试开发社区
0
Vite 4.3 为何性能爆表？
大厂技术 高级前端 Node进阶点击上方 程序员成长指北，关注公众号回复1，加入高级Node交流群Vite 4.3 相比 Vite 4.2 取得了惊人的性能提升，下面和大家分享一下 Vite 4.3 性能大幅提升的幕后技术细节，深度阅读，全程高能
程序员成长指北
0
【性能监控】如何有效监测网页静态资源大小？
前言作为前端人员肯定经常遇到这样的场景：需求刚上线，产品拿着手机来找你，为什么页面打开这么慢呀，心想自己开发的时候也有注意性能问题呀，不可能会这么夸张。那没办法只能排查下是哪一块影响了页面的整体性能，打开浏览器控制台一看，页面上的这些配图每张都非常大，心想这些配图都这么大，页面怎么快，那么我们有没有
高级前端进阶
0
Linux系统性能优化：七个实战经验
来源公众号：twt社区IT社区原文链接：https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/Rey0gSnnj-zoAEwE6J-GjwLinux系统的性能是指操作系统完成任务的有效性、稳定性和响应速度。Linux系统管理员可能经常会遇到系统不稳定、响应速度慢等问题，例如在Linux上搭建了一个w
开源Linux
1
21.3K star！推荐一款可视化自动化测试/爬虫/数据采集神器！功能免费且强大！
【温馨提示】由于公众号更改了推送规则，不再按照时间顺序排列，如果不想错过测试开发技术精心准备的的干货文章，请将测试开发技术设为“星标☆”，看完文章在文尾处点亮“在看”！大家好，我是狂师！在大数据时代，信息的获取与分析变得尤为重要。对于开发者、数据分析师乃至非技术人员来说，能够高效地采集网络数据并进行
测试开发技术
4
漫游CPU缓存效应，让你的程序性能飙升！
推荐一个原创技术号-非科班大厂码农，号主是机械专业转行进入腾讯的后端程序员！大多数读者都知道cache是一种快速小型的内存，用以存储最近访问内存位置。这种描述合理而准确，但是更多地了解一些处理器缓存工作中的“烦人”细节对于理解程序运行性能有很大帮助。在这篇博客中，我将运用代码示例来详解 cache工
码农有道公众号
1