C++核心准则C.49:构造函数中应该做的是初始化而不是赋值
C.49: Prefer initialization to assignment in constructors
C.49:构造函数中应该做的是初始化而不是赋值
Reason(原因)
Example, bad(反面示例)
Example, better still(更好的示例)
C.49:构造函数中应该做的是初始化而不是赋值
An initialization explicitly states that initialization, rather than assignment, is done and can be more elegant and efficient. Prevents "use before set" errors.
初始化明确地表明所做的是初始化而不是赋值,而且可以做得更优美,更有效率。防止“赋值之前使用”的错误。
class A { // Good
string s1;
public:
A(czstring p) : s1{p} { } // GOOD: directly construct (and the C-string is explicitly named)
// ...
};
class B { // BAD
string s1;
public:
B(const char* p) { s1 = p; } // BAD: default constructor followed by assignment
// ...
};
class C { // UGLY, aka very bad
int* p;
public:
C() { cout << *p; p = new int{10}; } // accidental use before initialized
// ...
};
Instead of those const char*s we could use gsl::string_span or (in C++17) std::string_view as a more general way to present arguments to a function:
相对于那些const char* s,我们应该可以使用gsl::string_span或者(C++17引入的)std::string_view作为表达函数参数怒的更加普遍的方式(https://github.com/isocpp/CppCoreGuidelines/blob/master/CppCoreGuidelines.md#Rstr-view)。
class D { // Good
string s1;
public:
A(string_view v) : s1{v} { } // GOOD: directly construct
// ...
};
https://github.com/isocpp/CppCoreGuidelines/blob/master/CppCoreGuidelines.md#c49-prefer-initialization-to-assignment-in-constructors
觉得本文有帮助?请分享给更多人。
关注【面向对象思考】轻松学习每一天!
面向对象开发,面向对象思考!
评论